For Proactive High Availability, which automation and remediation level prevents VMs from running on partially degraded hosts?

The choice indicating that the Automation Level is set to "Manual" and the Remediation Level to "Quarantine mode" is indeed suitable for Proactive High Availability.

In this context, when the Automation Level is set to "Manual," the system will not automatically take actions to migrate virtual machines; it requires administrator intervention. This is an essential configuration for environments where you want to ensure that hosts that are not performing optimally are isolated from the rest of the cluster until evaluated by an administrator.

The use of "Quarantine mode" as the Remediation Level serves to make sure that any hosts identified as partially degraded are effectively isolated. This mode prevents virtual machines from being powered on or continuing to run on these problematic hosts. By quarantining degraded hosts, proactive measures can be taken to resolve underlying issues without impacting virtual machines adversely.

In contrast, higher automation levels such as "Automated" or "Mixed mode" might proceed with actions that could run VMs on hosts that are showing signs of degradation, thus not aligning with the goal of preventing VMs from running in such conditions. The focus on maintaining control and taking measured interventions is key in scenarios where host performance is compromised. Thus, the combination of "Manual" automation and "Quarantine